Cryptography Research Skills
ChatGPT pluginResearch workflows for crypto
- Featured
- No
not on the featured shelf
Movement
From our daily snapshots over the last 30 days.
Rank by placement
Rank in Education & research
In its category
How this plugin compares with others in the same category. Positions are counted within the category, not across the whole directory.
Education & research305th of 402 by placement
| # | Plugin | Position | 7d |
|---|---|---|---|
| 302 | #5187 | — | |
| 303 | #5194 | — | |
| 304 | #5201 | — | |
| 305 | #5214 | — | |
| 306 | #5227 | — | |
| 307 | #5230 | — | |
| 308 | #5251 | — |
Twelve focused skills for researchers working on cryptographic constructions and papers, especially secure multiparty computation and zero-knowledge proofs.
Formulate research questions, trace literature claims to primary sources, draft and minimally edit technical prose, and examine security arguments under their stated definitions and assumptions. For implementation work, use separate workflows for protocol correspondence, benchmark accounting, evaluation writing, and reproducible artifacts.
The skills emphasize precise models, evidence provenance, conservative claims, and keeping the requested scope small. Proof audits distinguish confirmed errors, proof gaps, unstated assumptions, and unverified dependencies. They are read-only unless edits or proof completion are requested.
This package provides workflow instructions and references. It does not certify security, replace expert review, or supply a proof assistant. The host agent's available tools determine which searches, file edits, builds, and experiments can actually run.
Example prompts
- “Audit this cryptographic proof under its stated model. Report gaps without editing the source.”
- “Improve this cryptography paragraph with the smallest edit that preserves its claim and notation.”
- “Check whether these benchmark measurements support the comparison and its stated cost boundaries.”
Skills
crypto-ai-acknowledgements
Draft or review AI-use disclosures in cryptography papers from the actual account of assistance and human checking. Distinguish research, writing, code, experiments, and formalization; do not certify proofs or infer AI use.
crypto-benchmarking
Design, run, or audit cryptographic experiments and evidence-to-table calculations with explicit timing, communication, memory, and statistical accounting. Use for measurements and their interpretation, not protocol implementation or evaluation prose alone.
crypto-correlation-accounting
Define and compare cryptographic correlation counts, PCG expansion ratios, and throughput units by algebraic relation, domain, grouping, and denominator. Use when lanes, entries, blocks, calls, or correlation rates are ambiguous; not for protocol implementation or benchmark execution alone.
crypto-implementation-evaluation-writing
Draft, revise, or review cryptography implementation and evaluation sections from code and experimental evidence. Use for supported performance claims, fair comparisons, and identifying missing evidence; not benchmark execution or raw analysis alone.
crypto-literature-evidence
Find and verify primary-source cryptography claims, compare paper versions, and synthesize literature or research methods with exact source locators. Use for citation checks and surveys; not for proof-validity audits or prose revision alone.
crypto-manuscript-qa
Check cryptography manuscript sources, LaTeX builds, PDF locations, references, layout, and requested paper/code consistency. Use for source or rendered-document QA; not for prose-only drafting, proof validity, or benchmark collection.
crypto-prior-work-comparison
Draft or review cryptography prior-work comparisons and comparison tables by aligning models, construction variants, costs, and evidence. Use for positioning results, not literature discovery alone or benchmark execution.
crypto-proof-auditor
Audit or complete cryptographic proofs, reductions, simulators, and security theorems. Use for proof-validity questions; read-only unless completion or source edits are requested. Not for prose-only, code-conformance, or PDF reviews.
crypto-protocol-implementation
Implement, optimize, reproduce, or review cryptographic protocol code against its specification. Use for circuit, transcript, state, sampler, and adapter fidelity and security obligations affected by code changes; not a full proof-validity audit.
crypto-research-artifacts
Prepare, document, anonymize, validate, or package cryptography research artifacts. Use for reviewer workflows, claim-to-command maps, and validation from a fresh extraction; not protocol proofs or benchmark execution alone.
crypto-research-framing
Turn an exploratory cryptography idea into a candidate lemma, construction approach, counterexample, or precise obstruction. Use for choosing the next mathematical step, not local prose edits or auditing an existing proof.
cryptography-writing
Draft or minimally edit cryptography manuscripts, including definitions, theorem statements, security arguments, abstracts, and technical overviews. Preserve the construction and guarantee; use crypto-proof-auditor for substantive proof-validity review.
- Categories
- Made by
- Ziyang Jin · Website
- Sign-in
- On Install
- Capabilities
- Research framing and literature evidence, Cryptographic proof review, Technical writing and manuscript checks, Protocol implementation and benchmark accounting, Reproducible research artifacts
- Availability
- Available
- Version
- 0.1.0
- Keywords
- cryptography, research, MPC, zero-knowledge, proofs, scientific-writing
- Created
- September 21, 2026