HoldsUp
ChatGPT pluginPodcast claims vs the research
- Featured
- No
not on the featured shelf
Movement
From our daily snapshots over the last 30 days.
Rank by placement
Rank in Scientific research
In its category
How this plugin compares with others in the same category. Positions are counted within the category, not across the whole directory.
Scientific research19th of 22 by placement
| # | Plugin | Position | 7d |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | #3354 | 192places down | |
| 17 | #3643 | 79places up | |
| 18 | #3875 | 306places up | |
| 19 | #4146 | — | |
| 20 | #4186 | — | |
| 21 | #4208 | — | |
| 22 | #4309 | — |
HoldsUp checks what health and science podcasts claim against the published research. Ask whether a claim has been checked and get the verdict (supported, overstated, needs context, contradicted or unverified), the GRADE certainty, a one-line note and the studies behind it with their PubMed id, evidence level and retraction status. Verify a new claim live against PubMed and OpenAlex in 20 to 70 seconds. Read a speaker's track record, a show, a topic, a single study, or the money behind it from public funding registers. Sign in by email, pay per call from prepaid credits (1 credit = 1 US cent: a read 1, a claim search 2, a live verification 30), and see the cost and your balance in every answer. Evidence summaries about published research, not medical advice.
Example prompts
- “Has the claim "creatine damages your kidneys" been checked, and what did the studies find?”
- “What has Andrew Huberman claimed about creatine on air, and how do those claims hold up?”
- “Who funded the studies behind what Huberman says about creatine, and how sure is the evidence?”
- Categories
- Sign-in
- On Install
- Availability
- Available
- Version
- 1.0.0
- Created
- September 25, 2026
- More info