LegalQuants Litigation

cite-check

Verify supplied citations, check authorities, and detect hallucinated case law before filing. Use when the user asks to cite-check a brief, validate authorities, verify quotations, or catch fabricated citations.

client-update

Prepare evidence-first litigation matter, event, portfolio, or outside-counsel status updates that separate verified developments from analysis, recommendations, and decisions, and make deadlines, budgets, exposure, risks, owners, sources, and recipient boundaries actionable. Use when a lawyer needs a decision-ready client report or portfolio view; do not send or publish it.

correspondence

Triage inbound and draft source-grounded U.S. litigation correspondence, including discovery meet-and-confer letters, settlement demands and counteroffers, and substantive pre-suit or case communications. Use when a lawyer needs a precise, review-ready draft with authority, fact provenance, deadlines, negotiation-status cautions, and a no-send gate.

depositions

Prepare, conduct, and close the loop on a deposition using claims, elements, chronology, exhibits, admissions, impeachment, ethics, and transcript evidence. Use when planning a deposition, preparing a witness, structuring Rule 30(b)(6) topics, or extracting deposition follow-up.

docreview

Review an incoming litigation production against the matter's requests or issues, with deterministic inventory and coverage receipts, a plain-language setup approval, human privilege decisions, source-linked Requests/Documents HTML, and drift-bound lawyer feedback. Use when asked to organize or review a production, map documents to RFPs or pleadings, identify production gaps, or prepare a privilege queue.

document-discovery

Plan, draft, and review U.S. federal civil preservation and document-discovery work, including editable response shells, source-linked objection-library curation, local objection-review pages, and Word drafts from attorney selections. Use for bounded preservation, requests, responses, subpoena triage, privilege-log routing, and conferral work; not service, production, filing, contact, system changes, or incoming-production review.

legaldesign

Create one polished, editable, evidence-grounded HTML explanation of supplied or completed legal work. Use for a self-contained one-pager, a slide brief with a clickable overview, visual companions to advice or findings, reusable templates, and firm color setup. Resolve missing intake before designing; preserve the fixed house components, editor, popups, and client/template exports.

lq-start

Ask which CODEX for Legal skill fits the work in front of you. A map of the installed skills by situation, with one pick and the prompt to type, and a line on what the other LegalQuants plugins add. The same door ships in every LegalQuants plugin. Type it when you do not know what to type. Not for doing legal work, and not a coach.

new-matter

Open a litigation matter through a human-confirmed intake that records the parties, role, side, forum, engagement and authority, conflicts posture, emergency dates, preservation posture, status, stable identifiers, and field-level provenance. Use when a new dispute, claim, subpoena, regulatory inquiry, investigation, or pre-suit threat needs a controlled matter record and a handoff to organize-case-docs.

organize-case-docs

Turn an accepted or active litigation matter’s documents and metadata into a provenance-backed case workspace with source inventory, chronology, proof charts, issue and evidence mapping, trackers, lifecycle controls, and an explicit docreview handoff. Use after controlled intake or when restructuring, updating, or closing a matter; use new-matter to create the initial matter record.

pressuretest

Pressure-test a legal position against the documents the user supplies. Use only when the user explicitly asks to pressure-test, stress-test or red-team an argument, or asks whether a pleading, submission, advice, connected contract set or the other side's case holds together on its own logic, dates, figures and cross-document consistency. Not for verifying citations or authorities (that is /cite-check), reading a redline, or legal research.

regulatory

Regulatory research, refreshing earlier research, jurisdiction comparison and legality checks built on primary sources — retrieves the instrument from its official publisher, proves which version it is, and quotes only from the bytes it fetched. Use when the user has a regulation problem: understanding what a law requires, checking whether text they hold is current, re-running earlier research against the instrument as it stands today, or comparing how a rule differs across markets. Domain- and sector-agnostic: any instrument, country or area of law. Trigger even without the word "regulatory" — e.g. "what does the AI Act require," "is this still in force," "has this changed since we advised," "how does this differ in the UK," "we're planning to launch X, where does that land," "find me the actual text of," "is our compliance memo out of date." Answers questions about legal requirements with cited support; identifies unresolved facts and judgments without deciding disputed application questions.