Oximy Reality Checks
ChatGPT pluginVerify consequential AI work
- Featured
- No
not on the featured shelf
Movement
From our daily snapshots over the last 30 days.
Rank by placement
Rank in Productivity
In its category
How this plugin compares with others in the same category. Positions are counted within the category, not across the whole directory.
Productivity1,195th of 1,371 by placement
| # | Plugin | Position | 7d |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1192 | #5368 | — | |
| 1193 | #5371 | — | |
| 1194 | #5372 | — | |
| 1195 | #5374 | — | |
| 1196 | #5380 | — | |
| 1197 | #5381 | — | |
| 1198 | #5382 | — |
Ten local-first checks for consequential AI work. Trace where data moved, review what an agent can remember, compare AI drafts with accepted work, right-size agent access, diagnose failed runs, and verify claimed outcomes against durable systems of record. Every check separates evidence from inference, preserves unknowns, and ends with a visible completion criterion.
Example prompts
- “Check whether this agent task actually finished.”
- “Review this material before I share it with AI.”
- “Find where this agent run first went wrong.”
Skills
agent-autopsy
Reconstruct a completed, failed, expensive, or confusing agent session to find where its trajectory broke and what one change would prevent recurrence. Use when investigating post-hoc session diagnosis, tool-loop analysis, goal drift, premature completion, or repeated human rescue. Do not use as employee performance scoring.
bottleneck-shift
Compare a workflow before and after AI assistance to determine whether work disappeared or moved into review, waiting, correction, exception handling, or rework. Use when someone asks whether AI improved an end-to-end process rather than one production step. Do not claim causal impact from an uncontrolled before-and-after comparison.
did-it-land
Reconcile an AI agent's completion claims with durable evidence in the relevant system of record. Use when someone asks whether agent work actually finished, shipped, sent, changed, or reached production. Do not use a passing local check as proof of an unobserved remote or real-world state.
human-review-tax
Compare an AI-produced artifact with the accepted final artifact and quantify the human correction and review it required. Use when someone asks whether AI saved work or shifted effort into editing, review, rework, or escalation. Do not infer time saved, authorship, or causality from a text diff alone.
policy-vs-reality
Compare written AI policy with observed agent configuration and runtime evidence, producing a non-accusatory mismatch ledger. Use when someone wants to test whether approved tools, data rules, permissions, retention, review gates, or prohibited actions match practice. Do not use individual activity as a proxy for intent or misconduct.
right-size-my-agent
Compare an agent's configured capabilities with observed tool use and propose a least-privilege configuration for defined workflows. Use when someone wants to reduce agent permissions, MCP access, filesystem scope, network reach, or approval bypasses. Do not apply permission changes or infer safe denial from non-use alone.
safe-to-paste
Inspect text or files before they are shared with an AI service, make a task-preserving redacted copy, and explain residual exposure. Use when someone asks whether material is safe to paste or upload, or wants sensitive content sanitized for AI use. Do not treat the result as legal approval or a guarantee of vendor handling.
skill-sunset
Decide whether an installed agent skill should be kept, narrowed, revised, merged, quarantined, or retired using real activation and outcome evidence. Use when skills are stale, conflicting, noisy, costly, unused, or suspected of worsening work. Do not delete or rewrite a skill without explicit approval.
what-does-my-ai-remember
Audit persistent information an AI agent can reuse across sessions, including provenance, sensitivity, staleness, contradictions, scope, and deletion evidence. Use when someone asks what an assistant remembers about them or a project, or wants a memory cleanup plan. Do not delete or rewrite memories without explicit approval.
where-did-my-data-go
Reconstruct the data journey of a specific AI task from local traces, tool configuration, logs, and artifacts. Use when someone asks what an agent read, transmitted, processed, stored, remembered, displayed, or reported. Do not infer vendor retention or deletion from local traffic evidence alone.
- Categories
- Sign-in
- On Install
- Capabilities
- Read, Analyze, Write local reports
- Availability
- Available
- Version
- 0.1.2
- Keywords
- ai, audit, evidence, privacy, security, workflows
- Created
- September 15, 2026
- More info