Codex Security
ChatGPT pluginSecurity scanning for your codebase
- Featured
- No
not on the featured shelf
Movement
From our daily snapshots over the last 30 days.
Rank by placement
Rank in Security
In its category
How this plugin compares with others in the same category. Positions are counted within the category, not across the whole directory.
Security1st of 46 by placement
| # | Plugin | Position | 7d |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | #336 | 47places down | |
| 2 | #455 | 40places down | |
| 3 | #552 | 28places down | |
| 4 | #594 | 23places down | |
| 5 | #814 | 25places down | |
| 6 | #966 | 11places down | |
| 7 | #1161 | 6places down |
More from OpenAI
All listings by OpenAIHealth#5 of 6,022 by placement
Company Knowledge#104 of 6,022 by placement
Sales#105 of 6,022 by placement
ChatGPT Ads Manager#178 of 6,022 by placement
Finances#185 of 6,022 by placement
Data#188 of 6,022 by placement
30 more on the publisher’s page.
Codex Security packages reusable workflows for security scans, analysis, validation, and investigation across code, diffs, and related artifacts.
Example prompts
- “Run a Codex Security scan on this repository.”
- “Run a Codex Security diff scan on this PR, commit, branch diff, or working-tree patch.”
- “Triage existing security findings against this repository.”
Skills
assess-patch-risk
Assess an immutable patch artifact's program impact, regression risk, and auto-merge eligibility. Use for generated patch files, provider pull-request diffs, or commit ranges when reviewers need evidence about affected runtime paths, contracts, tests, and recoverability. This skill is read-only and does not generate, edit, apply, push, or merge the patch.
attack-path-analysis
Use when Codex is already in the attack-path-analysis phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to trace a security finding from source to sink and calibrate severity. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
deep-security-scan
Use when the user asks for a deep, exhaustive, multi-pass, or variance-reducing repository-wide or scoped-path Codex Security scan. Run repeated complete independent Standard scans with the Codex Security deep-scan tool, which aggregates their validated findings and prepares the canonical artifacts; then complete the same scan once. Do not use for PRs, commits, branch diffs, or working-tree diffs.
define-security-policy
Define, review, or update SECURITY.md guidance for a repository or component. Use when the user wants to clarify what Codex Security should review, what is out of scope, which security properties must hold, or whether existing guidance still matches the code.
finding-discovery
Use when Codex is already in the finding-discovery phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to discover candidate security findings in a repository or code change. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
fix-finding
Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
propose-security-hardening
Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.
security-diff-scan
Review a pull request, commit, branch diff, or working-tree patch for security vulnerabilities.
security-scan
Use for a standard, single-pass security audit of an entire repository or a scoped path, package, folder, or submodule with no diff to review. This is the default repository scan. Do not use for PR, commit, branch, or working-tree diffs, or for deep, multi-pass scans.
threat-model
Use when Codex is already in the threat-modeling phase of a security scan, the user explicitly invokes $threat-model, or the user explicitly asks to create, update, or persist a repository threat model. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
track-findings
Track validated Codex Security findings in Linear, Jira, GitHub issues, or draft GitHub security advisories. Supports issue batches, duplicate checks, and reviewed writes. Do not use for scans or fixes.
triage-finding
Triage supplied or imported security findings against a repository using its security policy and static code evidence. Accepts scanner reports, advisories, GitHub findings, and Jira or Linear tickets. Do not use for discovery, duplicate triage, runtime validation, or fixes.
Show all 15Show fewer
validation
Use when Codex is already in the validation phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to determine whether one or more candidate security findings are valid. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
verify-fix
Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.
vulnerability-writeup
Turn vulnerability notes, disclosure reports, PoCs, source code, or Codex Security findings into self-contained, sceptically validated, natural-sounding vulnerability reports. Use for one vulnerability or a disclosure campaign; a Codex Security scan is optional.
- Categories
- Sign-in
- On Install
- Capabilities
- Interactive, Read, Write
- Availability
- Available
- Version
- 0.1.32
- Keywords
- security, code-review, diff-review, appsec, threat-modeling
- Created
- May 14, 2026
- More info